<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RevRomansky Blogtown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revromansky.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Unfathomable Love of Jesus Christ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s With This Healing Stuff? by gabrielle eden</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>gabrielle eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I went on a search for Jesus healing, just as you said.  I am hungry to find those who believe in healing, as I am weary of those who argue against it.

Thank you for this post.  I will contact you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went on a search for Jesus healing, just as you said.  I am hungry to find those who believe in healing, as I am weary of those who argue against it.</p>
<p>Thank you for this post.  I will contact you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Christianity by Sue</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/obama-black-liberation-theology-and-christianity/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Would a Coptic Christian living in Ethiopa at any time in history have anything in common with you?

Or any of the Desert Fathers?
Or Saint Hildegard of Bingen?
Or Saint Seraphim of Sarov?
Or saint Francis?

The &quot;true&quot; Christian church has always been defined by those who had the power. And the heretics more often than not suffered a terrible and bloody fate for their &quot;heresy&quot;, dissent, or non-conformity.

Either the power that comes through the use of swords, guns and bombs.

Or those that control or controlled the language. Especially those that put together the scriptures.

And who spoke, or rather lived the true gospel, in post-Reformation Europe during the decades long wars between the Protestants and Catholics. Millions were thus thus slaughtered and wholesale destruction of properety crops and churches, was the (dis)-order of the day.

And werent the Ku Klux Klan good ol boy white southern christians?   Strange fruit indeed.

As were the people that created the Apartheid state in South Africa.

And wasnt the church heavily involved in, and indeed gave its blessing to, the African slave trade. How many millions were thus murdered and treated as sub-humans.

And isnt good ol boy white christian america the worlds largest maker, owner, seller and USER of weapons of all kinds, especially WMD&#039;s?

Who would Jesus bomb?

Which gun or guns would Jesus recommend that people own and use?

How old should a child be before he/she is introduced to the &quot;culture&quot; of guns. And given his/her first gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a Coptic Christian living in Ethiopa at any time in history have anything in common with you?</p>
<p>Or any of the Desert Fathers?<br />
Or Saint Hildegard of Bingen?<br />
Or Saint Seraphim of Sarov?<br />
Or saint Francis?</p>
<p>The &#8220;true&#8221; Christian church has always been defined by those who had the power. And the heretics more often than not suffered a terrible and bloody fate for their &#8220;heresy&#8221;, dissent, or non-conformity.</p>
<p>Either the power that comes through the use of swords, guns and bombs.</p>
<p>Or those that control or controlled the language. Especially those that put together the scriptures.</p>
<p>And who spoke, or rather lived the true gospel, in post-Reformation Europe during the decades long wars between the Protestants and Catholics. Millions were thus thus slaughtered and wholesale destruction of properety crops and churches, was the (dis)-order of the day.</p>
<p>And werent the Ku Klux Klan good ol boy white southern christians?   Strange fruit indeed.</p>
<p>As were the people that created the Apartheid state in South Africa.</p>
<p>And wasnt the church heavily involved in, and indeed gave its blessing to, the African slave trade. How many millions were thus murdered and treated as sub-humans.</p>
<p>And isnt good ol boy white christian america the worlds largest maker, owner, seller and USER of weapons of all kinds, especially WMD&#8217;s?</p>
<p>Who would Jesus bomb?</p>
<p>Which gun or guns would Jesus recommend that people own and use?</p>
<p>How old should a child be before he/she is introduced to the &#8220;culture&#8221; of guns. And given his/her first gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s With This Healing Stuff? by Jason</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-40</guid>
		<description>theology 101:  God is good 100% of the time; Satin is bad 100% of the time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theology 101:  God is good 100% of the time; Satin is bad 100% of the time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s With This Healing Stuff? by CHARISMATICA &#187; Recent Testimonies of Healing</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>CHARISMATICA &#187; Recent Testimonies of Healing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 07:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/&#160; :Testimony of healing of eye sight and teaching on healing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/&#160" rel="nofollow">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/&#160</a>; :Testimony of healing of eye sight and teaching on healing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Christianity by Sue</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/obama-black-liberation-theology-and-christianity/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Ii don&#039;t believe that HObama cultists will pay any mind to the facts you have given us.  They don&#039;t want the truth, it might interfere with the fantasy that is the man.  On the other hand, I am a free thinker and can see the validity of your piece.  Thank you for your honesty and for daring to incite criticism with your politically incorrect veracity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ii don&#8217;t believe that HObama cultists will pay any mind to the facts you have given us.  They don&#8217;t want the truth, it might interfere with the fantasy that is the man.  On the other hand, I am a free thinker and can see the validity of your piece.  Thank you for your honesty and for daring to incite criticism with your politically incorrect veracity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Christianity by revromansky</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/obama-black-liberation-theology-and-christianity/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>revromansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-36</guid>
		<description>The political &quot;church&quot; murdered more true Christians through the ages than anybody else.

And then there&#039;s the atheists, via the likes of Stalin.  40 million mostly Christians murdered during the Bolshevik revolution.

Bill Brady, your comments do not belie your intentions.  

Jesus died for YOU.  Not religion, not a church.  Jesus.  Time to turn from your own ways and embrace Him.  Quit using religion as an excuse.  It&#039;s about Jesus, not a religion.

God Bless,

RevRomansky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The political &#8220;church&#8221; murdered more true Christians through the ages than anybody else.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the atheists, via the likes of Stalin.  40 million mostly Christians murdered during the Bolshevik revolution.</p>
<p>Bill Brady, your comments do not belie your intentions.  </p>
<p>Jesus died for YOU.  Not religion, not a church.  Jesus.  Time to turn from your own ways and embrace Him.  Quit using religion as an excuse.  It&#8217;s about Jesus, not a religion.</p>
<p>God Bless,</p>
<p>RevRomansky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Christianity by bill brady</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/obama-black-liberation-theology-and-christianity/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>bill brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-35</guid>
		<description>religion is the real poison here, black, white, muslim, jewish. everyone thinks they are right and the other wrong, the christians killed so  many for not believing for thousands of years unchecked and now the tide is turning, I think that any religion that wants the death of another religion it ridiculous. the anglo are no better than the blacks or muslim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>religion is the real poison here, black, white, muslim, jewish. everyone thinks they are right and the other wrong, the christians killed so  many for not believing for thousands of years unchecked and now the tide is turning, I think that any religion that wants the death of another religion it ridiculous. the anglo are no better than the blacks or muslim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;I&#8217;m Sorry&#8221;-Why Do Women Say It? by revromansky</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/im-sorry-why-do-women-say-it/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>revromansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Sue.  Very enlightening to one who is still learning.  Proof alone that gender is intrinsic and not learned.

God Bless,

RevRomansky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Sue.  Very enlightening to one who is still learning.  Proof alone that gender is intrinsic and not learned.</p>
<p>God Bless,</p>
<p>RevRomansky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Street Preaching-Yea, Nay, and How? by Tommy Dorsey</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/street-preaching-yea-nay-and-how/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Dorsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Proving God is impossible without faith, as I&#039;m sure you know. Without faith, there is no evidence. After you have faith, you can see the evidence everywhere, at least that&#039;s how it worked for me. There were no miracles, no multiplying fish, no shiny bright angels, just plain and simple realization that He is there and I am lost. Morse, it&#039;s like your Bible Study on YouTube, you see the Gospel of John from a faithless point of view, so it&#039;s just stories to you, some of which are simply too incredible for you to believe. If and when you ever decide to allow yourself to have faith, if you will take that step, the Gospel of John (and every other book of the Bible) will take on an entirely different meaning to you. This is probably why you see so much frustration in the conversations you have with Christians. Much of what we see if filtered through faith, and none of what you see is, so we see two entirely different realities. When you have faith that my invisible dragon exists, he will allow you to see what color he is ;). The Rev is saying that until you have faith, your arguments with Christians will go no where. You claim not to be denying God. You are denying faith by demanding proof, which is in effect denying God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proving God is impossible without faith, as I&#8217;m sure you know. Without faith, there is no evidence. After you have faith, you can see the evidence everywhere, at least that&#8217;s how it worked for me. There were no miracles, no multiplying fish, no shiny bright angels, just plain and simple realization that He is there and I am lost. Morse, it&#8217;s like your Bible Study on YouTube, you see the Gospel of John from a faithless point of view, so it&#8217;s just stories to you, some of which are simply too incredible for you to believe. If and when you ever decide to allow yourself to have faith, if you will take that step, the Gospel of John (and every other book of the Bible) will take on an entirely different meaning to you. This is probably why you see so much frustration in the conversations you have with Christians. Much of what we see if filtered through faith, and none of what you see is, so we see two entirely different realities. When you have faith that my invisible dragon exists, he will allow you to see what color he is <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . The Rev is saying that until you have faith, your arguments with Christians will go no where. You claim not to be denying God. You are denying faith by demanding proof, which is in effect denying God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Street Preaching-Yea, Nay, and How? by morsec0de</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/street-preaching-yea-nay-and-how/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>morsec0de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Denying it? No sir.

One need not deny something that has yet to be proven.

Same goes for spirit.

Show us that spirit exists, and then we&#039;ll gladly argue about the specifics of it with you.

But we can&#039;t argue with you about the color of your pet invisible dragon until you can show us that this creature exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denying it? No sir.</p>
<p>One need not deny something that has yet to be proven.</p>
<p>Same goes for spirit.</p>
<p>Show us that spirit exists, and then we&#8217;ll gladly argue about the specifics of it with you.</p>
<p>But we can&#8217;t argue with you about the color of your pet invisible dragon until you can show us that this creature exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Street Preaching-Yea, Nay, and How? by revromansky</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/street-preaching-yea-nay-and-how/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>revromansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Atheists,

You enter a theological conversation denying the basic premise, God is.  Except you believe this, there is no conversation.  Your removing the third leg from the stool, that of &quot;spirit&quot;.  

Man&#039;s denial does not change the nature of the almighty and loving God.  

RevRomansky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atheists,</p>
<p>You enter a theological conversation denying the basic premise, God is.  Except you believe this, there is no conversation.  Your removing the third leg from the stool, that of &#8220;spirit&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Man&#8217;s denial does not change the nature of the almighty and loving God.  </p>
<p>RevRomansky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s With This Healing Stuff? by revromansky</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>revromansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Willis-

Satan &quot;put&quot; sickness on Job.  &quot;And the Lord said unto Satan; Behold, all that he has is in thine [Satan&#039;s] power...&quot;.  God doesn&#039;t make Christians sick, but he allows sickness, having created Satan with the propensity for evil.  To be fair, I must note that God has Himself destroyed and put plagues on the rebellious, but regarding this blog I am speaking to the individual believer who is struggling in faith, God&#039;s own child.  Job could be considered such.

Studies showed that I was to become progressively blind.  That is the only evidence of blindness I can show you.  No study was conducted of my own healing.  In my experience, most studies prove their original suppositions.  No consensus was called from the population who can represent supernatural healing, but I&#039;m sure that a leading expert such as Pat Robertson or Oral Roberts could present overwhelming testimony supporting such.

As to Christians not being healed, a young man I prayed for was healed off of his death bed, only to die of different causes a few years later in spite of all prayers.  That&#039;s a tough one, and if you can explain the theology behind it I&#039;d be obliged.

But don&#039;t forget, death and sickness are God&#039;s enemies.  And we can&#039;t quit the fight of faith just because there&#039;s a casualty.  Abraham believed that, even if he killed, cut up, and burnt Isaac to ashes, he would nevertheless resurrect and fulfill God&#039;s promise.  That&#039;s the kind of faith we should have toward healing.

Again, no one ever asked Jesus to make them sick, but only to heal them.  And he healed everyone who asked.

God Bless,

RevRomansky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Willis-</p>
<p>Satan &#8220;put&#8221; sickness on Job.  &#8220;And the Lord said unto Satan; Behold, all that he has is in thine [Satan's] power&#8230;&#8221;.  God doesn&#8217;t make Christians sick, but he allows sickness, having created Satan with the propensity for evil.  To be fair, I must note that God has Himself destroyed and put plagues on the rebellious, but regarding this blog I am speaking to the individual believer who is struggling in faith, God&#8217;s own child.  Job could be considered such.</p>
<p>Studies showed that I was to become progressively blind.  That is the only evidence of blindness I can show you.  No study was conducted of my own healing.  In my experience, most studies prove their original suppositions.  No consensus was called from the population who can represent supernatural healing, but I&#8217;m sure that a leading expert such as Pat Robertson or Oral Roberts could present overwhelming testimony supporting such.</p>
<p>As to Christians not being healed, a young man I prayed for was healed off of his death bed, only to die of different causes a few years later in spite of all prayers.  That&#8217;s a tough one, and if you can explain the theology behind it I&#8217;d be obliged.</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t forget, death and sickness are God&#8217;s enemies.  And we can&#8217;t quit the fight of faith just because there&#8217;s a casualty.  Abraham believed that, even if he killed, cut up, and burnt Isaac to ashes, he would nevertheless resurrect and fulfill God&#8217;s promise.  That&#8217;s the kind of faith we should have toward healing.</p>
<p>Again, no one ever asked Jesus to make them sick, but only to heal them.  And he healed everyone who asked.</p>
<p>God Bless,</p>
<p>RevRomansky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Christianity by revromansky</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/obama-black-liberation-theology-and-christianity/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>revromansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Obama was &quot;saved&quot; to  this questionable religion, became a &quot;Christian&quot; therein, he was married and his children were baptized in it, and he was tutelaged by Rev. Wright (of &quot;God damn America&quot; fame) for twenty years.  He&#039;s also aligned with radical revolutionaries, Cone, Alinsky, and Ayers among others, who are for complete overthrow of this nation and who have personally promoted him.

Obama has been raised in a radical revolutionary theology and philosophy for most of his adult life.  He cut Wright off for political expediency, but has never denounced Cone.

However much you would personally question Christianity as a religion, simply disregarding Obama&#039;s associations because of your own prejudice against Christianity is ill advised.

Historically, when totalitarian powers such as represented by Obama&#039;s mentors comes into power, the first institution to suffer persecution is the Church due to its deep influence in society regarding the Church&#039;s intolerance of oppression and anti Christian philosophy such as totalitarian socialism.  We&#039;ve seen this in Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany.

This is the reason for this particular blog.  We have handled all sorts of presidents in our nation&#039;s history, and we&#039;ve survived.  I truly can&#039;t say that we would survive such a radical revolutionist whose public persona belies such an anti American and anti Christian political and philosophical paradigm. 

I hope that you would further research Obama&#039;s associations, some of whom he writes of in his own books.

God Bless,

RevRomansky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama was &#8220;saved&#8221; to  this questionable religion, became a &#8220;Christian&#8221; therein, he was married and his children were baptized in it, and he was tutelaged by Rev. Wright (of &#8220;God damn America&#8221; fame) for twenty years.  He&#8217;s also aligned with radical revolutionaries, Cone, Alinsky, and Ayers among others, who are for complete overthrow of this nation and who have personally promoted him.</p>
<p>Obama has been raised in a radical revolutionary theology and philosophy for most of his adult life.  He cut Wright off for political expediency, but has never denounced Cone.</p>
<p>However much you would personally question Christianity as a religion, simply disregarding Obama&#8217;s associations because of your own prejudice against Christianity is ill advised.</p>
<p>Historically, when totalitarian powers such as represented by Obama&#8217;s mentors comes into power, the first institution to suffer persecution is the Church due to its deep influence in society regarding the Church&#8217;s intolerance of oppression and anti Christian philosophy such as totalitarian socialism.  We&#8217;ve seen this in Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany.</p>
<p>This is the reason for this particular blog.  We have handled all sorts of presidents in our nation&#8217;s history, and we&#8217;ve survived.  I truly can&#8217;t say that we would survive such a radical revolutionist whose public persona belies such an anti American and anti Christian political and philosophical paradigm. </p>
<p>I hope that you would further research Obama&#8217;s associations, some of whom he writes of in his own books.</p>
<p>God Bless,</p>
<p>RevRomansky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Christianity by Louisa</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/obama-black-liberation-theology-and-christianity/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Louisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Just leave it up to one Christian to invalidate the beliefs of other Christians.  Only the Christians that believe the exact same things as you do are the &quot;real&quot; Christians, right?  Everyone else is a dirty fake! HAHA

Obama doesn&#039;t even believe the same things as Reverend Wright.  Why are you equating these people together by association?  Why would he want to redistribute wealth to the poor blacks?  He is very wealthy himself and is biracial.  

Christianity in general uses deception to recruit followers.  The entire religion is one big scam, so you are like a pot calling the kettle black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just leave it up to one Christian to invalidate the beliefs of other Christians.  Only the Christians that believe the exact same things as you do are the &#8220;real&#8221; Christians, right?  Everyone else is a dirty fake! HAHA</p>
<p>Obama doesn&#8217;t even believe the same things as Reverend Wright.  Why are you equating these people together by association?  Why would he want to redistribute wealth to the poor blacks?  He is very wealthy himself and is biracial.  </p>
<p>Christianity in general uses deception to recruit followers.  The entire religion is one big scam, so you are like a pot calling the kettle black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s With This Healing Stuff? by Tommy Dorsey</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Dorsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Adam AND Eve sold us out. Besides breaking God&#039;s commandment NOT to eat the fruit, Adam not only blamed the woman, but indirectly blamed God: &quot;The woman whom thou gavest to be with me&quot; Gen 3:12. Then in Gen 3:13 Eve proceeded to blame the serpent. Neither of them took responsibility, yet BOTH of them sinned. Certainly the serpent encouraged Eve. Certainly Eve encouraged Adam, but they made their own decision to eat. They were not forced. They had one rule and they broke it and did NOT ask forgiveness at any point. If you have kids, you might have a small idea of how disappointed God must have been. But you still love them!! As God loves us!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam AND Eve sold us out. Besides breaking God&#8217;s commandment NOT to eat the fruit, Adam not only blamed the woman, but indirectly blamed God: &#8220;The woman whom thou gavest to be with me&#8221; Gen 3:12. Then in Gen 3:13 Eve proceeded to blame the serpent. Neither of them took responsibility, yet BOTH of them sinned. Certainly the serpent encouraged Eve. Certainly Eve encouraged Adam, but they made their own decision to eat. They were not forced. They had one rule and they broke it and did NOT ask forgiveness at any point. If you have kids, you might have a small idea of how disappointed God must have been. But you still love them!! As God loves us!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s With This Healing Stuff? by Willis</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&quot;In the Bible, sickness was never put on anybody to prove their faith.&quot;
- What about Job?  And while it was indeed Satan that carried out the actual dirty deeds, it was only with God&#039;s blessing.

I&#039;m pleased to hear of your own healing, but I can&#039;t help but think of all the Christians that aren&#039;t healed and the non-Christians that are healed.  In fact, studies have shown that there is essentially no difference between the two.  How would you address that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the Bible, sickness was never put on anybody to prove their faith.&#8221;<br />
- What about Job?  And while it was indeed Satan that carried out the actual dirty deeds, it was only with God&#8217;s blessing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pleased to hear of your own healing, but I can&#8217;t help but think of all the Christians that aren&#8217;t healed and the non-Christians that are healed.  In fact, studies have shown that there is essentially no difference between the two.  How would you address that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;I&#8217;m Sorry&#8221;-Why Do Women Say It? by Sue</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/im-sorry-why-do-women-say-it/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I say I am sorry because I am polite and choose to diffuse.  I do not apologize for myself except when I am truly at fault.  Sorry does not only mean apology.  As a matter of fact, apology is only a small portion of the definition of sorry.  I won&#039;t bore you with all the meanings here.  Look it up.  

Back to sorry...When I say I&#039;m sorry you are upset, I am not apologizing, I am stating a fact.  I am sorry that you are upset.  Firstly, as an empathetic person, I really AM sorry you are upset.  Upset is not a good place to be.  Happy is a good place to be.  Mellow is a good place to be.  Upset, not so good.  I feel your suffering in your upset place and am sorry FOR YOU.  Secondly, when you are upset it colors the atmosphere around you and I happen to be in that atmosphere of your upset.  Consequently, I am affected by your upset in an existential way.  
I will continue to say I am sorry.  The world is a place full of hurt and I am very sorry for those who suffer, even if it is at the hands of their own twisted psychs.  

I think the woman&#039;s sorry you speak of is part of who we are, empathetic, nurturing, caring.  These are generally not traits associated with men.  

I&#039;m sorry if you have had difficulties in the past with understanding the nature of the female sorry.  I am sorry for you because it caused you to view women as other than they actually were.  What you apparently perceive as weakness is actually giving, loving and caring.  

I hope I have helped you see our sorry for what it is, a selfless (sometimes) verbal pat on the back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say I am sorry because I am polite and choose to diffuse.  I do not apologize for myself except when I am truly at fault.  Sorry does not only mean apology.  As a matter of fact, apology is only a small portion of the definition of sorry.  I won&#8217;t bore you with all the meanings here.  Look it up.  </p>
<p>Back to sorry&#8230;When I say I&#8217;m sorry you are upset, I am not apologizing, I am stating a fact.  I am sorry that you are upset.  Firstly, as an empathetic person, I really AM sorry you are upset.  Upset is not a good place to be.  Happy is a good place to be.  Mellow is a good place to be.  Upset, not so good.  I feel your suffering in your upset place and am sorry FOR YOU.  Secondly, when you are upset it colors the atmosphere around you and I happen to be in that atmosphere of your upset.  Consequently, I am affected by your upset in an existential way.<br />
I will continue to say I am sorry.  The world is a place full of hurt and I am very sorry for those who suffer, even if it is at the hands of their own twisted psychs.  </p>
<p>I think the woman&#8217;s sorry you speak of is part of who we are, empathetic, nurturing, caring.  These are generally not traits associated with men.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if you have had difficulties in the past with understanding the nature of the female sorry.  I am sorry for you because it caused you to view women as other than they actually were.  What you apparently perceive as weakness is actually giving, loving and caring.  </p>
<p>I hope I have helped you see our sorry for what it is, a selfless (sometimes) verbal pat on the back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Christianity by Obamalover</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/obama-black-liberation-theology-and-christianity/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamalover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care what you say, RevRomansky, I&#039;m voting for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care what you say, RevRomansky, I&#8217;m voting for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama, Black Liberation Theology, and Christianity by Christianity</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/obama-black-liberation-theology-and-christianity/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Christianity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-22</guid>
		<description>We are supposed to think about what this was, of course, and when we do, we usually think better, more philosophically even. &lt;a href=&quot;http://bible.postedpost.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Christianity&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are supposed to think about what this was, of course, and when we do, we usually think better, more philosophically even. <a href="http://bible.postedpost.com/" rel="nofollow">Christianity</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s With This Healing Stuff? by Bierpens</title>
		<link>http://revromansky.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/whats-with-this-healing-stuff/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Bierpens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revromansky.wordpress.com/?p=87#comment-18</guid>
		<description>No answer yet?

Are you pondering my question?

I am still pondering your answer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No answer yet?</p>
<p>Are you pondering my question?</p>
<p>I am still pondering your answer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
